Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, David Wilder and Cody Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
GRAY v. SASNETT et al
as 7:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GRAY
Defendant:
CATHY SASNETT, SGT. KYLE WHITE and MIKE WELCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gray v. Hemminger
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
Robert Hemminger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKS et al v. CITY OF LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
NAZIRE PARKS, GREGORY PARKS, MONIQUE NELSON and others
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF LAWRENCE, LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. City of Alpharetta et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Alpharetta, Arick Furr and Harold Shoffeitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Wright
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
Chris Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25255
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GRAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRANT et al v. CITY OF LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2022cv01449
Plaintiff:
Destanie Grant, Stephanie Mathews and STEPHANIE MATTHEWS
Defendant:
CITY OF LAWRENCE, LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Luxottica of America Inc. v. Brave Optical, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Luxottica of America Inc.
Defendant:
Brave Optical, Inc., Jeffrey Gray and Dawn Gray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
GRAY v. DILLARD et al
as 7:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GRAY
Defendant:
PETE DILLARD, Officer BRITTANY JOHNSON, Officer JERIAH RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
