Cases 1 - 10 of 54
MacNeil v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dudley MacNeil
Defendant:
Judge Harris, Judge Butler, Twin Falls County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corvin English v. George Kral, et al
as 23-3860
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORVIN ENGLISH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF GEORGE KRAL, in his official and individual capacity, LIEUTENANT BRENT SCOBLE, in his official and individual capacity, OFFICER JEREMY THOMAS, in his official and individual capacity and others
Thomas v. Abbeville High School et al
as 6:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Thomas
Defendant:
Abbeville High School, Kipp L Duplechine, Thomas J Byler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEMASTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04792
Plaintiff:
JEREMY THOMAS LEMASTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schaefer v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Thomas Schaefer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
KEOGH-JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
JEREMY THOMAS KEOGH-JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Porter v. Bennett et al
as 2:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Aaron Bennett, Dillon Tynes, Lloyd Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17158
Plaintiff:
JEREMY THOMAS POWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
