Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bernal v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv08014
Defendant:
Eve R. Berg, Joanne Person, Mirjana Nichiporuk Tolt and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maria Bernal
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02232
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Joseph Dingler
as 17-14393
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH DINGLER
Mandamus Respondent:
JAMES N. HATTEN, U.S. Dustrict Court, Clerk, JUSTIN S. ANAND, U.S. District Court, AMY TOTENBERG, U.S. District Court and others
Dingler et al v. Hatten et al
as 1:2017cv03632
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler and Ashton Dingler
Defendant:
James N. Hatten, Justin S. Anand, Amy Totenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Williams et al
as 4:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Unknown Williams, Christine Nixon, Unknown Burchum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Libbey et al
as 4:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Faye Libbey, Unknown Party, Karyn E Klausner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Libbey et al
as 2:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Faye Libbey, John Wohler, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Libbey et al
as 4:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Faye Libbey, Dolores Hurtado, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Libbey et al
as 4:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Faye Libbey, Dolores Hurtado, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Libbey et al
as 4:2011cv00844
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Faye Libbey, Arizona, State of, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
