Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lori Grohol v. American Bar Ass'n, et al
as 26-3223
Plaintiff:
LORI GROHOL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
AMERICAN BAR ASS'N, BLOOMSBURG FAIR ASS'N, MATTHEW W. BRANN and others
Lori Grohol v. Pennsylvania Courts Administrative Office, et al
as 26-2595
Plaintiff:
LORI GROHOL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
AMERICAN BAR ASS'N, BLOOMSBURG FAIR ASS'N, MATTHEW W. BRANN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grohol v. Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts et al
as 4:2026cv01437
Plaintiff:
Lori Grohol
Defendant:
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, American Bar Association, Bloomsburg Fair Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2026sf65010
Plaintiff:
Jessica Chapman
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Unknown v Unknown
as 1:2025cv07483
Plaintiff:
iSolved HCM, LLC
Defendant:
Paylocity Corporation, Jessica Chapman and Gregory Peel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Chapman v. Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc et al
as 6:2022cv00996
Defendant:
Ulta Salon Cosmetics and Fragrance, Inc., Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc and Joico Laboratories Inc
Plaintiff:
Jessica Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56167
Plaintiff:
JESSICA CHAPMAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
