Cases 1 - 10 of 15
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Biden
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DAVID v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02084
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bey v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jamil Malik Bey
Defendant:
Joe Biden and The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, MERRICK GARLAND, XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Johnson v. Joe Biden, Trump, Obama Administration et al
as 1:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Queen Elizabeth, Dr Faucci, Joe Biden, Trump, Obama Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence O Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Society et al
as 3:2021cv00310
Defendant:
LaPorte County Metro Operations, LaPorte City Police Department, Nigel Albaneze and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr, Rev Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert Omer Pratt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Martinez et al
as 3:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, University of Notre Dame Du Lac, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00798
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COURTROOM LEGISLATORS, JOE BIDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PHILLIP BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
