Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Livingston v. Doe Crawford County Detention Staff Members et al
as 2:2020cv02213
Defendant:
David LNU, John/Jane Doe Crawford County Detention Staff Members, Lieutenant Winstead and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Allen Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Miller County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2019cv04013
Defendant:
Shane Johnson, John & Jane Doe Employees, Richard Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Johnson County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2018cv02153
Defendant:
Johnson County Sheriff's Department, John & Jane Doe 1-20, Johnson County, Arkansas and others
Plaintiff:
Shanna Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02109
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Smith v. Landon et al
as 5:2017cv05071
Plaintiff:
Leon Michael Smith
Defendant:
John Doe Landon, John/Jane Doe Office Manager, Dr. Karas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cass et al v. Solis et al
as 6:2015cv06045
Plaintiff:
Teagan P. Cass and Johnny Mark Bliss
Defendant:
Barney Solis , David Jones , Greg Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Hollenbeck et al
as 2:2014cv02112
Plaintiff:
Anthony Davenport
Defendant:
Bill Hollenbeck and John/Jane Does, 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Benton County Detention Center et al
as 5:2014cv05008
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Avery
Defendant:
Benton County Detention Center, Guyll, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fishinghawk v. Powers et al
as 2:2013cv02221
Plaintiff:
Bryce Fishinghawk
Defendant:
Jeffery C. Powers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Campbell et al
as 4:2009cv04077
Plaintiff:
Dan L. Martin
Defendant:
Charles Campbell, Peggy Cryer, Janice Vigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
