Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv00841
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John Michael Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EVANS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07969
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. EVANS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30469
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. EVANS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
EVANS et al v. ANCHOR PACKING CO. et al
as 2:2010cv82699
Plaintiff:
M. JEANNE EVANS and JOHN F EVANS
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO., ATLAS ASBESTOS CO., INC., A.W. CHESTERTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jane Doe, et al v. Indian River School District, et al
as 10-1819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, JAMIE DOE and JOHN DOE, individually and as parents and next friend of
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIAN RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT, INDIAN RIVER SCHOOL BOARD, HARVEY L. WALLS and others
HOUSTON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04691
Plaintiff:
TUNG HOUSTON, YVONNE ADAMS, CELIA AGUILAR and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EVANS v. DETROIT DIESEL, CORP.
as 2:2009cv01151
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. EVANS
Defendant:
DETROIT DIESEL, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. EVANS
as 1:2009cv03197
Plaintiff:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN T. EVANS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
EVANS et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL CO et al
as 2:2009cv65830
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. EVANS, JOHN R. EVANS, JOHN R. EVANS and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL CO, GARLOCK, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
