Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Liu v. Rubio et al
as 5:2026cv04540
Plaintiff:
Yunxi Liu
Defendant:
Marco Rubio, John Armstrong, Scott Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MEIDLER v. RUBIO et al
as 1:2026cv01614
Plaintiff:
BERNARDO FAINCAIG MEIDLER
Defendant:
MARCO RUBIO, JOHN ARMSTRONG, CHRIS ANDINO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHANG v. RUBIO et al
as 5:2026cv04322
Plaintiff:
RUOXI ZHANG
Defendant:
MARCO RUBIO, JOHN ARMSTRONG, SCOTT WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHANG v. RUBIO et al
as 2:2026cv05169
Plaintiff:
RUIBO ZHANG
Defendant:
MARCO RUBIO, JOHN ARMSTRONG, WILLIAM M COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
