Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Laurence v. Neronha, et al
as 25-1932
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LAURENCE, JR.
Defendant:
PETER F. NERONHA, Attorney General, WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., in the individual and official capacity as Director, RACHEL C. BRAY, in the individual and official capacity as Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Carr v. San Mateo County et al
as 4:2025cv04879
Plaintiff:
Marion A. Carr
Defendant:
San Mateo County, Board of Parole Hearing, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scharborough v. Elmira Police Department et al
as 6:2025cv06186
Plaintiff:
John-tel Douglas Scharborough
Defendant:
Elmira Police Department and J. Baer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00391
Respondent:
Tyrell Davis
Petitioner:
John C. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Martin
as 6:2024cv00409
Defendant:
O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Martin
Plaintiff:
John Jeremiah Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States v. John Douglas
as 24-1576
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Joseph Douglas
DOUGLAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03860
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAY DOUGLAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas v. Warden of FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01106
Petitioner:
John Joseph Douglas
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
