Cases 1 - 8 of 8
COTE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv07267
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COTE and JOHN COTE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99796
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN COTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ardaneh v. US Government, et al
as 20-1887
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMBRIDGE DISTRICT COURT, HEATHER STROUD, US JEWISH MAFIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAMID REZA ARDANEH
LODER v. MAINE INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS CENTER et al
as 2:2020cv00157
Defendant:
SCOTT IRELAND, MAINE INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS CENTER, MICHAEL JOHNSTON and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LODER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardaneh v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2020cv03450
Defendant:
Evaluator Sara Laniado, Clerk of the Brockton District Court, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Reza Ardaneh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Cote (John Cote)
as 14-2032
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandra Cote
Defendant - Appellant:
John Cote
Cote v. Hartford Corr Ctr et al
as 3:2013cv01158
Petitioner:
John Cote
Respondent:
James E. Dzurenda and Hartford Corr Ctr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Munns, et al v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-15969
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK MUNNS, CHRISTA MUNNS, administrators for the separate Estate of Joshua Munns, DENNIS DEBRABANDER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of State, JENNIFER FOO, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
