Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Bridges v. Keller et al
as 1:2010cv00113
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller, Jr., John Doe, I, S Kiley and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bridges
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Galeas Jr. v. Beck et al
as 5:2010ct03086
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr.
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, Boyd Bennett, Ricky Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Sharpe et al
as 5:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
LaQuez Simmons
Defendant:
Chad Sharpe, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
CALDWELL v. DEATON et al
as 1:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
EMMETT W. CALDWELL
Defendant:
CHRISTY DEATON, RACHEL EMERSON, DEBBIE BATCHELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Thomas v. Holly et al
as 5:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Thomas
Defendant:
R. V. Holly, Pablo Mora, Mark Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSER v. PERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
DANE R. MOSER
Defendant:
PERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Watkins v. Bennett et al
as 5:2009ct03127
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dominic Watkins
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Betty Brown, Becky Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owens v. Cavaleri et al
as 5:2009ct03100
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Owens
Defendant:
Mr. Cavaleri, John Doe, 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. City of Knightdale et al
as 5:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
City of Knightdale, Skip Blaylock, J.T. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
