Cases 41 - 50 of 160
EVANS et al v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
SEMAJ CARTER and LEAH EVANS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES (4), JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN et al v. M&S TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Defendant:
THE PEGGS COMPANY, INC., JOHN DOE #1, BEDROCK LOGISTICS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN and FRANCES SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. CAPOZZA, et al
as 2:2021cv00133
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
RONELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LATTA v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2021cv00038
Defendant:
THOMAS GAULT, JOHN DOE #4, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY LATTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANUEL v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv01759
Defendant:
ASST SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, C/O SERGENT WILES, C/O LT. DAILEY and others
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FERREIRAS v. RICE-GREGO et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Defendant:
CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, RN CARTER, RN MARK JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FERREIRAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TEETS v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2020cv01334
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and JOHN DOE 1
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RAY TEETS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MARTYNUSKA et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
P.A. GOLDEN, C.O. JOZWIAK, LT. ROBISON and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
HARVEY SCOTT SCOTT and HARVEY SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
SHAEFER, HAY, GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. DEMASKE et al
as 2:2020cv01226
Defendant:
RICHARDS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GRIM, LIEUTENANT RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
