Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bryan et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
William Bryan, Jack Hinsberger and Nancy Welharticky
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Procter & Gamble Company, Walmart Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06011
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Richard Todd Ball and John Does 1-200
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Crow
Defendant:
Richard Todd Ball and John Does 1-200
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flomo Tealeh v. Ward County, et al
as 20-2196
Defendant / Appellee:
Sandra Richter, John Does, 1-200 inclusive, Ward County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Flomo Tealeh
Flomo Tealeh v. Ward County, et al
as 20-1611
Defendant / Appellee:
Sandra Richter, John Does 1-200, inclusive, Ward County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Flomo Tealeh
Flomo Tealeh v. Ward County, et al
as 20-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
Sandra Richter, John Does 1-200, inclusive, Ward County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Flomo Tealeh
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cullan and Cullan LLC v. CF Enterprises Pty. Ltd.
as 14-3868
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cullan and Cullan LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
M-Qube, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Mobile Messenger Americas, Inc., a Delaware corporation and John Does 1-200
Defendant - Appellant:
CF Enterprises Pty. Ltd., an Australian Company
Intervenor:
Richard Geier, David Hanson and Kristian Kunder
Cullan and Cullan LLC v. M-Qube et al
as 8:2013cv00172
Defendant:
CF Enterprises Pty., John Does 1-200, M-Qube and others
Plaintiff:
Cullan and Cullan LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
