Cases 51 - 60 of 2,816
JONES v. JOHN DOE 1-25 et al
as 2:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. JONES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-25 and LT. FUSCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
OCKOMBA v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
ROGER R OCKOMBA
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, OFFICER BRANDON MCWAYNE, OFFICER ERIC CIRINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vyacheslav et al v. The Schutzer Group, PLLC et al
as 1:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
TKACH VYACHESLAV and EKATERINA BALAKIREVA
Defendant:
THE SCHUTZER GROUP, PLLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sims v. Southwest Electronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sims
Defendant:
Southwest Electronics, Inc., Southwest Electronic Energy Corporation and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
