Cases 81 - 90 of 355
ANDERSON v. WESTROCK COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv09355
Plaintiff:
BROCK ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, WESTROCK SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
TOMPKINS v. GRAY SUPPLY CORP. et al
as 3:2020cv08960
Plaintiff:
ADAM TOMPKINS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, GRAY SUPPLY CORP. and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv06861
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TROIANO v. EXTREME SERVICE, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv06015
Defendant:
EXTREME SERVICE, LLC, JAMES VITALE, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TROIANO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DORVAL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURY DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv05997
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10, JOHN DOES 1-5, JOHN FURDA and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN L DORVAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jane Doe v. North Homes, Inc., et al
as 20-1974
Defendant / Appellee:
John Does 1-5, in their individual capacities, John Does 6-10, in their individual and official capacities, Devin Michael Wood, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe, (a pseudonym)
Valdez v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00671
Defendant:
John Does 6-10, John Does 1-5, John Does 11-15 and others
Plaintiff:
Elisha Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEVLIN v. LACEY TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv04068
Defendant:
DIMITRIOS TSARNAS, JOHN DOES 6-10, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
PAIGE E. DEVLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Walker v. Clarke et al
as 2:2020cv00542
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walker
Defendant:
John Does 6-10, Nancy Evans, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SICA v. WALMART INC. et al
as 3:2020cv03483
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, WALMART INC. and JOHN DOES 6-10
Plaintiff:
JOHN SICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
