Cases 31 - 39 of 39
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (JAMES YOUNG)
as 1:2010cv05204
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (GEORGE T. RODGERS)
as 1:2010cv05203
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE T. RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (CEDRIC ROYAL)
as 1:2010cv05205
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC ROYAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION(DAVID GILL)
as 1:2010cv02826
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atwood et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07958
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Schulte Atwood, Jay J. Authement, David M. Binder and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Reddy et al v. Colmers et al
as 8:2009cv02951
Plaintiff:
Pulla Reddy and Esther Reddy
Defendant:
John M. Colmers, Isiah Leggett and John Kenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. John Kenney
as 09-10382
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN KENNEY
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (Brian Hardy)
as 1:2009cv03739
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HARDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandt v. Clarke et al
as 2:2007cv00939
Plaintiff:
Danny H Brandt
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kenneth Quinn, Chris Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
