Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Fischer v. Dart, as Sheriff of Cook County et al
as 1:2025cv09635
Plaintiff:
Mikki Leigh Fischer
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, K Gaudie, Joseph Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dean v. Appelate Defenders et al
as 3:2024cv02173
Defendant:
Dato, Nora Weyl, Chris Love and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John Malloy v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00883
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
John Malloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MALLOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58677
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MALLOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barlow et al v. Paypal Account Inc. Owners et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Mr. R. Johnson, John Malloy and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III and Sarah M. David-Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atiles et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11854
Plaintiff:
Joseph Poidomani, Michael Lamorte, Paul Nietman and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
MALLOY et al v. CARRABBA'S RESTAURANT
as 1:2012cv05888
Plaintiff:
LINDA MALLOY and JOHN MALLOY
Defendant:
CARRABBA'S RESTAURANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MALLOY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2010cv03498
Plaintiff:
JOHN MALLOY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MALLOY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2010cv02771
Plaintiff:
JOHN MALLOY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
