Cases 11 - 20 of 199
(PC) Archer v. Pixley et al
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
John Peter Archer
Defendant:
Donald Pixley, J. Wolters, Xaiver Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Flores v. JPS Health Network et al
as 4:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dillon Flores
Defendant:
JPS Health Network, Dr. Shaw, Dr. Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. John Peter Smith Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Caesar Javier Garcia and Byron J Warren
Defendant:
John Peter Smith Hospital, Chase Bank, Mattel Inc Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glass v. John Peter Smith Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
John Peter Smith Hospital, FNU Shaw, All Nurse Practicioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
OKURUT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24207
Plaintiff:
JOHN PETER OKURUT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Jack et al
as 4:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Ginger L. Edwards
Defendant:
Grant H. Jack, Richard "Dick" Smith, Dallas District Atty's Ofc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08747
Plaintiff:
JOHN PETER MARANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
