Cases 1 - 10 of 16
LANKFORD v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2017cv00962
Plaintiff:
JOHN PIERCE LANKFORD
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2016cv03289
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Pierce v. Lawrence Ende
as 16-17011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. PIERCE, AKA John Pierce
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE ENDE
John Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, TN, et al
as 15-5561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PIERCE LANKFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE, TENNESSEE, HENDERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, R. ABEL, (CC #376) Former Hendersonville Police Officer and others
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Micky Miller, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Hendersonville Police Department, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Lankford v. Bill Holt
as 15-5333
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN PIERCE LANKFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL HOLT, Robertson County Sheriff
Lankford v. The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 3:2014cv02312
Petitioner:
John Pierce Lankford
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lankford v. The State of Tennessee 18th Judicial District of Sumner Co. at Gallatin 37066
as 3:2014cv02320
Petitioner:
John Pierce Lankford
Respondent:
Sonny Weatherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McIntyre v. Bliss et al
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kerry McIntyre
Defendant:
Robert Bliss, James Hurley, John Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
