Cases 1 - 10 of 30
RITCHIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53861
Plaintiff:
JOHN RITCHIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RITCHIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47885
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RITCHIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ritchie v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04216
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Pamala Swartz, Thomas Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
John Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mac v. Acacia Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11706
Defendant:
Laurinda Y. Pang, David J Aldrich, Benny P. Mikkelsen and others
Plaintiff:
Vinh Mac
Rosenblatt v. Acacia Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01470
Defendant:
Laurinda Y. Pang, David J. Aldrich, Benny P. Mikkelsen and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
O'Brien v. Acacia Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01463
Defendant:
Laurinda Y. Pang, Peter Y. Chung, Murugesan Shanmugarai and others
Plaintiff:
Robert O'Brien
Jiang v. Acacia Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07267
Defendant:
Laurinda Y. Pang, David J. Aldrich, Benny P. Mikkelsen and others
Plaintiff:
John Jiang
Sours et al v. Anderson Regional Medical Center et al
as 3:2019cv00473
Defendant:
Anderson Regional Medical Center, John Does 1 - 10, Anderson Health System and others
Plaintiff:
Julie Sours and John Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farah-Franco et al v. Rasmussen et al
as 1:2018cv10465
Plaintiff:
Sarah Farah-Franco and Russell Gourley
Defendant:
Christian J. Rasmussen, Francis J. Murphy, Murugesan Shanmugaraj and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Panjabi v. Aerohive Networks, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00656
Plaintiff:
Karan Panjabi
Defendant:
Aerohive Networks, Inc. , David K. Flynn and John Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
