Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01896
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman et al v. Lewis et al
as 6:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ariel Bowman, Carey Reese and Daryl Culbertson
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobart Lewis, Brayden L Leopold, Colin B Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Princeton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2020cv00788
Petitioner:
John William Princeton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gee v. Chesapeake Circuit Court et al
as 1:2020cv00221
Petitioner:
John William Gee, IV
Respondent:
Stephanie P. Pass and Chesapeake Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gee v. Chesapeake Circuit Court et al
as 7:2020cv00129
Petitioner:
John William Gee, IV
Respondent:
Stephanie P. Pass and Chesapeake Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fishback v. Onabojo
as 1:2019cv01699
Defendant:
Onabojo
Plaintiff:
John William Fishback, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Austin v. Greer et al
as 1:2019cv00371
Defendant:
Paul Thorton, Wendy Bishop, Charles Bains and others
Plaintiff:
Roshun Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fishback v. Graham
as 1:2018cv03152
Plaintiff:
John William Fishback, lll
Defendant:
Richard Graham
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fishback v. Graham et al
as 1:2017cv03234
Plaintiff:
John William Fishback, III
Defendant:
Richard Graham, Jr., R.S. Weber, Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
