Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, et al v. GHAFARI ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023cv01872
Counter Defendant:
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Ghafari Associates, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pepper Construction Co. of Indiana, LLC, Miller-Eads Co., ALBERS MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION et al v. GHAFARI ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023cv01884
Counter Defendant:
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GHAFARI ASSOCIATES, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
PEPPER CONSTRUCTION CO. OF INDIANA, LLC, MILLER-EADS CO., ALBERS MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Technology and Supply v. Johnson Control
as 17-2006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TECHNOLOGY AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLC, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INCORPORATED and JOHNSON CONTROLS FEDERAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Technology and Supply Management, LLC v. Johnson Controls Building Automation Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Technology and Supply Management, LLC
Defendant:
Johnson Controls Building Automation Systems, LLC , Johnson Controls, Inc. and Johnson Controls Federal Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY et al v. MICHIGAN LADDER COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv00308
Plaintiff:
DARYL M. RAY and THELA S. OLION-RAY
Defendant:
MICHIGAN LADDER COMPANY , JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS LLC and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
