Cases 1 - 10 of 1,261
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-7262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RICHES v. SHAHZAD et al
as 1:2010cv00494
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
FAISAL SHAHZAD and UMAR FAROUK ABDULMUTALLAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riches v. FAMM et al
as 3:2009cv00785
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
FAMM, Julie Stewart, Mary Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stanford v. Riches et al
as 3:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Stanford
Defendant:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Leroy King, Laura Pendergest-Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Vick et al
as 3:2009cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Michael Vick and Marcus Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. South Africa et al
as 3:2009cv00330
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
South Africa, African National Congress, Inc., Thabo Mbeki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riches v. Wong et al
as 3:2009cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jivery A. Wong, American Civic Association, Gander Mountain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Chicago Sun-Times et al
as 3:2009cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Chicago Sun-Times, Jeremy L. Halbreich, Suntimes.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Craiglist Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv01170
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Craiglist Inc., Jim Buckmaster, Philip Markoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00662
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
