Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06699
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Barr
as 19-2517
Respondent:
William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Jose Maximiliano Gonzalez, AKA Jose M Gonzalez
Schiro v. Cemex, S.A.B. de C.V. et ay
as 1:2018cv02352
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schiro
Defendant:
Cemex, S.A.B. de C.V. , Fernando A. Gonzalez Olivieri and Jose Antonio Gonzalez Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez v. Forlini's Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07130
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Forlini's Restaurant Inc. , Frank Forlini , Joseph Forlini and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chavez et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv03459
Plaintiff:
Tobias Bermudez Chavez , Gerardo Antonio Fonseca Torres , Franklin Guillen Salazar and others
Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Lifetrade Litigation
as 1:2017cv02987
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramiro Aviles, Gullermo Benelli, Alejandro Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Gonzalez v. Fenton et al
as 3:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jose I. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Fenton, Davis, Blanchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolalpa Villa v. Accura Restoration & Waterproofing LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00509
Defendant:
Accura Restoration & Waterproofing LLC, Accura Restoration Inc., Michael Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Gerardo Gonzalez Gonzalez and Ismael A. Tolalpa Villa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez v. Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06652
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Rochester Police Department , William Danno and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Ramon Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv01973
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Ramon Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
