Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Espinoza v. Brewster et al
as 5:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jose Espinoza
Defendant:
J Brewster, D Smith, S Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Andrew Espinoza
as 15-3489
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Andrew Jose Espinoza
Espinoza v. Sherman
as 1:2015cv01594
Petitioner:
Jose Espinoza
Respondent:
S. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ESPINOZA v. ANTILLEAN MARINE SHIPPING CORP et al
as 1:2015cv21839
Plaintiff:
JOSE ESPINOZA
Defendant:
ANTILLEAN MARINE SHIPPING CORP and FLORIDA CONTAINER REPAIRS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Jose Espinoza-Ventura
as 14-10329
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ESPINOZA-VENTURA, AKA Alfredo Ernesto-Ramirez, AKA Jesus Jose Tobar
ESPINOZA et al v. THE UNDERWOOD GROUP LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00594
Plaintiff:
JOSE ESPINOZA, ANGEL FONSECA and ROBERTO RUIZ
Defendant:
INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., THE UNDERWOOD GROUP LLC and DEBRA UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
STEINFIELD et al v. EMPG INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00944
Plaintiff:
SANDRA STEINFIELD and PAUL STEINFIELD
Defendant:
EMPG INTERNATIONAL, LLC, MARIO CORDERO, DESTINO TROPICAL DT S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Espinoza
as 4:2013cv05487
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jose Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Communications Act of 1994
Zelaya et al v. Tulalip Tribal Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Luis Zelaya, Amy Zelaya and Jose Espinoza
Defendant:
Tulalip Tribal Police Department and Ronald Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jose S. Espinoza
as 12-3931
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ESPINOZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
