Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Khan v. Madsen et al
as 5:2023cv06141
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Haley Madsen, Arlene Stephens, J. A. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01211
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez Bonilla
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02100
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Gonzalez-Perez v. United States
as 23-2998
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Gonzalez-Perez, also known as El Perro
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Wyatt et al v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv01210
Petitioner:
George Wyatt, Jr, Joe M Balencia, Rodolfo King Jones and others
Respondent:
State of Texas, USA, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv22390
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moreno v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez Moreno
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez-Cirino v. USA
as 3:2022cv01610
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez-Cirino
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gonzalez v. USA
as 6:2022cv06418
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al
as 9:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Sierra
Defendant:
John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
