Cases 11 - 20 of 25
PEREZ v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv02944
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PERRY BETTS, LINWOOD NORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. ANICETTE, M.D. et al
as 2:2014cv01044
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ VASQUEZ
Defendant:
ANNICETTE, M.D. , BROWN, M.D. , PEMBERTON, N.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
Jose Perez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perez v. Ebbert
as 1:2011cv00641
Petitioner:
Jose Perez
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PEREZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32014
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC, ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Jose Perez-Barron v. USA
as 10-3733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE PEREZ-BARRON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FBOP, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF FBOP and others
PEREZ v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2010cv00655
Petitioner:
JOSE PEREZ
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33566
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ, JR.
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PEREZ-BARRON V. UNITED STATES, et al.
as 3:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ-BARRON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FBOP, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF FBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CORSEY et al v. CAMDEN COUNTY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv02120
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CORSEY, JAMES WISE, JONATHON BROWN and others
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY ADMINISTRATION, E. TAYLOR and JOSEPH RIPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
