Cases 1 - 10 of 316
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramirez
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Torres
as 2:2023cv01075
Petitioner:
Alberto Jose Ramirez
Respondent:
Raul Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
D. Diaz v. Michel Rey Moore et al
as 2:2023cv10018
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales v. Singh et al
as 4:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Commercial Jose Litigation and Fernando Jose Ramirez Morales
Defendant:
Manider Singh and Chahal Ontime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
