Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Korenblit v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 26-1429
Plaintiff:
YONATAN AVIGDOR GREENBERG, EITAN BRACHA, MICHAL FRANK and others
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOE and XYZ CORPORATION
Grabowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00949
Plaintiff:
Joseph Albert Grabowski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
In re: Jean Dominique Morancy
as 26-10478
Petitioner:
In re: JEAN DOMINIQUE MORANCY and L.M.
Respondent:
SABRINA ALEX SALOMON, GERALD FRANCIS ZNOSKO, ANGELA LAMBIASE and others
Fuchs v. USA
as 3:2026cv00006
Petitioner:
Joseph Albert Fuchs, III
Respondent:
USA and Adam Fein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Douglas v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2025cv00511
Petitioner:
Joseph Albert Douglas
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joseph Novak v. Jeffery Thorne, et al
as 25-2167
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALBERT NOVAK
Defendant:
JEFFERY L. THORNE, RON HEEG, REBECCA FISCHER and others
Taylor v. NE Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2025cv03141
Plaintiff:
Joseph Albert Taylor
Defendant:
NE Department of Corrections, NE Division of Parole, City of Lincoln, NE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Korenblit et al v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv04288
Plaintiff:
EMUNA KORENBLIT, YONATAN AVIGDOR GREENBERG, MICHAL FRANK and others
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
NOVAK v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2025cv00982
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALBERT NOVAK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOVAK v. FIELDS
as 1:2025cv00789
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ALBERT NOVAK
Respondent:
KIRK FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
