Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Nationwide Insurance Company v. Spinal Imaging, Inc., et al
as 12-1834
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
SPINAL IMAGING, INC. and BRUCE ABELSON
Defendant:
JOHN R. HENRY, a/k/a Jack Henry, DUANE MARQUART, JOSEPH BOYLE and others
Nationwide Insurance Company v. Spinal Imaging, Inc., et al
as 12-1834
Defendant:
CITADEL CHIROPRACTIC, P. A., ATLAS ORTHOGONAL CHIROPRACTIC, P. A., MICHAEL LODES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SPINAL IMAGING, INC. and BRUCE ABELSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Emmett v. Swartz et al
as 7:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
NFN Swartz, Joseph Boyle, NFN Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Livingston et al
as 7:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Wayne Calhoun
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Oliver J Bell, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Wilson et al
as 4:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael A Powell
Defendant:
Sharen Wilson, Ben Leonaro, Danielle DeGualt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Livingston et al
as 1:2011cv00052
Defendant:
Oliver J. Bell, Joseph Boyle, William Brosam and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Wayne Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Sims et al
as 7:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jerry Bob Freeman
Defendant:
Lesley Sims, Mathew Lang and Joseph Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madhu Agarwal, et al v. Jersey City, et al
as 10-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MADHU AGARWAL and ANIL AGARWAL, Dr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JERSEY CITY, JOSEPH MAZZONE, JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL COURT and others
White v. Texas D of Criminal Justice
as 7:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee White, Jr
Defendant:
Texas D of Criminal Justice, Michael D Hill, Tamilay Metzger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Worthem v. Joseph Boyle
as 09-3043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. WORTHEM
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH BOYLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
