Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Love v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 2:2026cv01266
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Love, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail, State of Wisconsin Government, Waukesha County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Bremer
as 5:2025cv01808
Petitioner:
Joseph Daniel Walls
Respondent:
Bremer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
John Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MANUEL RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEADENY, Doctor, MASHA JOHNS, Doctor and others
Walls et al v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2020cv01224
Plaintiff:
DeAndrae J. Thomas, Michael Emory, Frankie Galindez and others
Defendant:
Matt Wolford, Dr. Adah, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Adams v. Governor of Delaware
as 19-1617
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES R. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE
Undetermined:
JOSEPH M. WALLS
Wall v. Perry
as 5:2018ct03164
Defendant:
Officer Perry
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raheem Wall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Ellis
as 5:2018ct03155
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raheem Wall, Jr.
Defendant:
Jonathan Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Alpers
as 5:2017ct03236
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raheem Wall, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Alpers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
