Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thompson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States v. Joseph Thompson, Sr.
as 23-3558
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Thompson, Sr.
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02783
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02258
Petitioner:
Joseph Thompson
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re: Joseph Thompson
as 23-12329
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH THOMPSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THOMPSON v. SAFEWAY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01995
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thompson
Defendant:
SAFEWAY/ALBERSONS CO., WOLF PROFESSIONAL SECURITY, INC., Unknown Security Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thompson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05847
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thompson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Rebecca Bogard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanley Joseph Thompson v. Brian Birkholtz
as 2:2022cv05483
Petitioner:
Stanley Joseph Thompson
Respondent:
Brian Birkholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stanley ThompsonIn re: Stanley Thompson
as 22-12525
Petitioner:
In re: STANLEY JOSEPH THOMPSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
