Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Christopher Ellington v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 13-15692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ELLINGTON, AKA Christopher M. Ellington
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General, BRADLEY M. SOOS, Judge, ROBERT CARTER OLSON, Judge and others
Ellington v. Horne et al
as 2:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Ellington
Defendant:
Thomas C Horne, Bradley M Soos, Robert Carter Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 12-3430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael A. Nelson
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Harris v. Shand et al
as 1:2012cv01845
Plaintiff:
Robert-Scott Harris
Defendant:
Nadia Shand, Annemarie De Tommaso, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Beachum
as 3:2012cv01288
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant:
Robert Lee Beachum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Chavez et al
as 5:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Rito Chavez, Raquel Chavez, Silvia Calado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coates v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2012cv00590
Plaintiff:
Norticia Jeanette Coates
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pinedo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 2:2011cv01116
Plaintiff:
Juan Pinedo
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vernell et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2011cv20310
Plaintiff:
Janet Vernell and Louis Vernell
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank , Shapiro Ramos, P.A. , Cynthia Ramos and others
Mediator:
Arden Siegendorg and Arden M. Siegendorf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
