Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Lemberg v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 3:2017cv05241
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Ann Lemberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JENKINS v. JPMORGAN CHASEBANK
as 1:2017cv00752
Plaintiff:
JOHN LAMAR JENKINS
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514
Bloom et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2015cv21187
Plaintiff:
Martin Bloom and Cynthia Bloom
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gringer v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2014cv00837
Plaintiff:
Viviane Gringer
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fernandez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2014cv01830
Plaintiff:
Maria Fernandez
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Loomis Armored US, LLC , Willie A. Faircloth Berthelot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pennington v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
as 2:2014cv00251
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Pennington, Jr.
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daley v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2013cv03387
Plaintiff:
Laurel M. Daley
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deelen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 4:2013cv01931
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Michael Van Deelen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
KAAT v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2013cv01778
Plaintiff:
LINDA KAAT
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Kolta v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2013cv01584
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Kolta
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Investment Services, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
