Cases 1 - 10 of 38
U.S. Bank National Association v. Juan Enriquez et al
as 2:2024cv03499
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Juan Enriquez, Antonio Torres and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
US Bank National Association v. Juan Enriquez et al
as 2:2024cv02822
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Juan Enriquez, Antonio Torres and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
U.S. Bank National Association v. Juan Enriquez et al
as 2:2024cv01605
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Juan Enriquez, Antonio Torres and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
U.S. Bank National Assocation v. Enriquez et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Assocation
Defendant:
Juan Enriquez, Antonio Torres and Does 1 through 20
THURMAN v. WELTON et al
as 1:2023cv01943
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH THURMAN
Defendant:
MARSHALL WELTON, SLB ACQUISITIONS LLC, SLB ASSETS II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
ENRIQUEZ v. 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC et al
as 7:2021cv10347
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Plaintiff:
JUAN ENRIQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 20-20554
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Enriquez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 20-50904
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Enriquez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Enriquez v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2020cv00977
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Juan Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Enriquez v. Davis
as 4:2020cv02895
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Juan Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
