Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Vicente-de Jesus v. Saul
as 19-2267
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUAN VICENTE-DE JESUS
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Vicente-de Jesus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
Juan Vicente-de Jesus
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
MURRAY v. WARDEN
as 2:2017cv00461
Petitioner:
JUAN VICENTE MURRAY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Juan Vicente-Pu v. U.S. Attorney General
as 16-15963
Petitioner:
JUAN VICENTE-PU
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Dinzey-Hazle et al
as 3:2015cv01428
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Juan Vicente Dinzey-Hazle, Esperanza Flores-Romero and Conjugal Partnership Dinzey-Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Loaiza
as 14-1819
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Omar Elkin De Jesus Madrid, Fredy Ferney Gonzalez Monsalve, Leduan Arango Mazo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jorge Hernandez Gutie Loaiza
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solis v. PTM Berry Farms LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01296
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Defendant:
PTM Berry Farms LLC , Marvin Van Mersbergen , Alvaro Vicente and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ana Vicente, et al v. Roger Barnett, et al
as 12-16333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANA MARIA VICENTE, SARA VASQUEZ, JORGE PEREZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROGER BARNETT
Defendant:
BARBARA BARNETT, DONALD BARNETT and COCHISE COUNTY
Ana Vicente, et al v. Roger Barnett, et al
as 09-17522
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANA MARIA VICENTE, SARA VASQUEZ, JORGE PEREZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROGER BARNETT
Defendant:
BARBARA BARNETT, DONALD BARNETT and COCHISE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
