Cases 1 - 10 of 40
First Franchise Capital Corporation v. Denn-Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
First Franchise Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Denn-Ohio, LLC, JMAD Hospitality, LLC, PTS Hospitality, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smola v. Chronister et al
as 8:2022cv02383
Plaintiff:
Joshua Smola
Defendant:
Chad Chronister and Jack Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv02917
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jack Thompson and Sandra Jane Thompson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44826
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JACK THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smola v. Thompson
as 8:2019cv01789
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Smola
Defendant:
Jack Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wray v. Chronister et al
as 8:2019cv00865
Defendant:
Jack Kolka, Chad Chronister, Jack Williams and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Wray and James Alan Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Applied Services Augmentation Partners, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00127
Plaintiff:
Jack Thompson
Defendant:
Applied Services Augmentation Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Pryor v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2016cv00218
Petitioner:
Barry Bailey Pryor
Defendant:
State of Texas, Brooks H Hagler, Mike Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pryor v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2016cv00459
Plaintiff:
Barry Bailey Pryor
Defendant:
State of Texas, H Hagler, Mike Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
