Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Howard v. Republican National Committee
as 23-3826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB HOWARD, for himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, a Political Action Committee
Howard v. Republican National Committee et al
as 2:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Jacob Howard
Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOB HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47914
Plaintiff:
JACOB HOWARD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. Effenbeck et al
as 5:2019cv03151
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jacob Howard
Defendant:
Ellen Mitchell, Julie Effenbeck and Stephen Brave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Howard
as 17-6125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RYAN JACOB HOWARD
Moore v. Village of Sauk Village et al
as 1:2016cv02861
Plaintiff:
Shirley Moore
Defendant:
Village of Sauk Village, Gary Luke, Rebecca Sailsbery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicolaas v. Pace et al
as 2:2012cv01357
Plaintiff:
Jacob Howard Nicolaas
Defendant:
Alexander Pace, Jane Doe Pace, City of Bellingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Howard v. Jane Doe et al
as 2:2011cv00532
Defendant:
M. Almaguer, M. Almaguer, M. Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Howard
Jacob Howard v. Bernadette Gambino, et al
as 10-56241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNADETTE GAMBINO, LA Sheriff Dept Chief Medical Officer LA County Jail, TAKAGAWA, LA County Sheriff Officer and KENNETH BAYLESS, Chief Medical Officer, Los Angeles County Jail
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
