Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Lieutenant Samantha Smith, Emily Hanuska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elder v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett Elder
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Sergeant Justice Cato, Sergeant John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Robert Hayden Salazar
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook, Sergeant Abby Yarbrough, Correctional Officer Dylan Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02121
Plaintiff:
Jonha Don Bell
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook and Parole Officer Ben Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
Jonha Don Bell
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Dylan Ross, Jail Administrator Jacob Shook and Jailer Coty Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sexton v. Griffith et al
as 2:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
Dustin Andrew Sexton
Defendant:
Sergeant John Griffith and Jail Administrator Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Shook
as 2:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Truman Keith
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roy Britt
Defendant:
Jacob Shook, Jail Administrator Jacob Shook, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Shook
as 4:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roy Britt
Defendant:
Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
