Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION SERVICES, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Araujo v. Jade Shank Trucking et al
as 1:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Shane C. Araujo
Defendant:
Jade Shank Trucking and Thomas J. Hoskinson
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Shaver v. Kapp et al
as 3:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Trevion Shaver
Defendant:
Shane Kapp and Jade Servin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Olmstead et al
as 3:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Hunt
Defendant:
Russell Olmstead and Jade Servin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pictor v. Coultas et al
as 3:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pictor and Matthew Eric Pictor
Defendant:
Madison Coultas, Jade Servin and Olmstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asher et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Cory Feltner, Anna Standafer, Alex Powell and others
Defendant:
Andrews Dairy Store Inc, Lear Corporation Eeds and Interiors, LLC, CP Product LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACOBS v. PHERSON et al
as 2:2019cv00625
Defendant:
BRANDON PHERSON and JADE REEDY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JERGER et al v. BLAIZE et al
as 3:2018cv00030
Defendant:
SHANNON BLAIZE and ALISON GARRETT
Plaintiff:
J. J., JADE JERGER and LELAH JERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEAL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
JADE NEAL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
