Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2023cv05086
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2020cv03872
Plaintiff:
James Clyde Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00121
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
JAMES BILLIEJO SMITH
Smith v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Claudy Smith
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00334
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James Smith v. Nancy Berryhill
as 18-15033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D.A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security
Smith v. Colvin
as 3:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
James Laurence Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
