Cases 11 - 20 of 191
Pipkins v. Stewart
as 22-30687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Renee Pipkins, Everitt Pipkins, Theron Jackson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
James E. Stewart, Sr., in his official capacity
Davis v. Wyche
as 22-30636
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dennis Ray Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Bobby Wyche, Rickey Farss, Thomas Englade and others
Stewart v. Finkley et al
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
James D. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Finkley, MDOC Corrections, Jackson County, MS and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Stewart
as 22-7025
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL STEWART
Davis v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Rickey Fraiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbin v. Stewart
as 5:2022cv00590
Petitioner:
Cedrick Dumar Dobbin
Respondent:
James E Stewart, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Stewart
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
James E Stewart, Sr and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Franklin et al
as 3:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
Cassandra Franklin, James LeBlanc, James E. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bledsoe v. Willis et al
as 5:2021cv04367
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Bledsoe
Defendant:
Dean Willis, David McClure, Brittany B Arvie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEWART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17502
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOWARD STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
