Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Bradley Beard v. James Schiebner
as 23-1608
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY JAMES BEARD
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
Shah v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 1:2023cv20770
Plaintiff:
Maulik Shah, Cesar Gonzalez, Daniel De La Cruz and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, ROBINHOOD SECURITIES LLC and ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Beard #403365 v. Schiebner
as 1:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Bradley James Beard #403365
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shah v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Maulik Shah, Cesar Gonzalez, Daniel De La Cruz and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC and Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
The James Beard Foundation, Inc. v. Epic-Cure, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03779
Plaintiff:
The James Beard Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Epic-Cure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Craine v. The James Beard Foundation, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12133
Defendant:
The James Beard Foundation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicole Craine
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust et al v. Republic Services, Inc.
as 3:2018cv02118
Plaintiff:
ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust , James Beard and Larry Morrison
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Clifton v. Patrick et al
as 1:2017cv01035
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton
Defendant:
Bettye Patrick, Charlotte Richey, James Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust et al v. Republic Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05123
Plaintiff:
ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust , James Beard and Larry Morrison
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
William Glenn Rogers v. Jeremy James Beard
as 2:2016mc00039
Respondent:
Jeremy James Beard
Petitioner:
William Glenn Rogers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
