Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Pepper, et al. v. Apple Inc.
as 24-875
Respondent:
ROBERT PEPPER, STEPHEN H. SCHWARTZ, EDWARD W. HAYTER and others
Petitioner:
APPLE INC.
Jonathan Rhodes v. Joseph McFadden
as 23-6341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN DONELL EDWARDS RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH MCFADDEN, JAMES BLACKWELL, TIFFANY RAVENELL and others
Reed v. Carpenelli et al
as 9:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Benji D. Reed
Defendant:
Michael Carpenelli, Timothy Thayer, James Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv03231
Defendant:
Joseph McFadden, Bryan Stirling, Tiffany Ravenell and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Donell Edwards Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Frazier v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2020cv03032
Defendant:
Joseph McFadden and James Blackwell
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER et al v. CAPPER SENIOR I, LP et al
as 1:2020mc00012
Plaintiff:
CARL BECKWITH, FRANKLIN BROWN, CAROLYN EAVES-GOFF and others
Defendant:
CAPPER SENIOR I GP, LLC, FOREST CITY CAPPER/CAROLLSBURG, INC., FC CAPPER SENIOR I, LLC and others
Frazier v. Kindel et al
as 1:2019cv03585
Defendant:
Warden Kindel, James Blackwell, Liber Corectinal inst and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackwell v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00180
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenny Sowell v. William Brightharp
as 17-6725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNY SOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCFADDEN, JAMES BLACKWELL and CAPTAIN MCBRIDE
York v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00795
Plaintiff:
Herbert Demond York
Defendant:
Sheik Johnson, Joseph McFadden, James Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
