Cases 31 - 40 of 156
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51233
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terry v. Garnett et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Tom Lynch, Curtis Jones, Officer Strickler and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31003
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 0:2021cv01527
Plaintiff:
James Brooks
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Abarr et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Richard Caton, Juan Estrada, Anthony Hollingsworth and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Hernandez v. GlassView, LLC
as 1:2021cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jack Hernandez
Defendant:
James Brooks, Jr. and GlassView, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl
Matthew James Brooks v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv10774
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES BROOKS
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commisioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87726
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv02885
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF FAYETTE
Petitioner:
JAMES BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51865
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
