Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ROEDL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24776
Plaintiff: JAMES CASPER ROEDL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20952
Plaintiff: JAMES CASPER and JAMES M CASPER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vogt v. Vogt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01347
Plaintiff: Donna Marie Vogt
Defendant: Donald Vogt, Terrence Bostic, JP Morgan Chase & Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casper, Lance et al v. Hubna et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00910
Plaintiff: Lance Lee James Casper
Defendant: C.O. Hubna and S.T.G. Benger
Undetermined: CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casper, Lance et al v. Thom-Hough We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00885
Plaintiff: Lance Lee James Casper
Undetermined: CCI Prison Facility
Defendant: C.O. Thom-Hough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casper, Lance et al v. unnamed We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00034
Plaintiff: Lance Lee James Casper
Defendant: unnamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2016cv05467
Plaintiff: Andrew James Casper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Casper v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00886
Plaintiff: Andrew James Casper
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00885
Plaintiff: Andrew James Casper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Casper et al v. Claiborne County, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00411
Plaintiff: James Casper and Mary Catherine Casper
Defendant: Claiborne County, Tennessee, David Ray and Steve Cline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?