Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Jason Brown, et al v. Cyrus Dolbin, et al
as 23-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON L. BROWN and A. M. B., Minor Child of Jason L. Brown
Defendant: CYRUS P. DOLBIN, Judge, MARK A. BARKET, Custody Officer, KAREN E. RISMILLER, Lawyer and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. DOMALAKES, Judge, DAVID RICE, Asst. DA, MICHEAL A. STINE, Public Defender and others
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff: John J. Liptok
Defendant: City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff: JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant: CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Dolbin et al
as 3:2023cv01040
Plaintiff: Jason L. Brown and A. M. B.
Defendant: Cyrus Palmer Dolbin, Mark A. Barket, Karen E. Rismiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodman et al v. Sentry Select Insurance Co et al
as 3:2022cv06178
Plaintiff: James Goodman and Hazel Jeanie Goodman
Defendant: Sentry Select Insurance Co, Remus Taylor and Quality Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Goodman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05869
Plaintiff: James Goodman and James D Goodman
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02684
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GOODMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68043
Plaintiff: JAMES GOODMAN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv16908
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
GOODMAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv14320
Plaintiff: CATHERINE A. GOODMAN and JAMES GOODMAN
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.), JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?