Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gray v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv00370
Petitioner:
Robert James Gray, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2018cv00344
Petitioner:
Robert James Gray, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2018cv00202
Petitioner:
Robert James Gray, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2017cv00086
Petitioner:
Robert James Gray, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Director, TDCJ-CID CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE ED/TX SHERMAN DIVISION
as 6:2017cv00056
Petitioner:
Robert James Gray, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
The Undersigned Prisoners and Robert James Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McEachern v. Gray et al
as 4:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Freddie McEachern, Jr
Defendant:
James Gray, Jr, Marion, City of, SC Dept of Social Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray et al v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 8:2011cv01786
Plaintiff:
James Gray, Jr. and Faye E. Gray
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
GRAY et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63848
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JAMES GRAY, JR. and JOREATHA ELLIS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ransom v. McEachern et al
as 4:2010cv02015
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Ransom
Defendant:
Freddie McEachern, K McCaskill, Walter Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
