Cases 11 - 20 of 194
STALEY v. AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03664
Plaintiff:
JEROME STALEY
Defendant:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, JAMES GREGORY and KIMBERLY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Demos v. Grimwood et al
as 2:2022cv00794
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Grimwood, Ben Van Beurden and James Gregory Dimond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2022cv02088
Petitioner:
James Gregory Wallace and John Patrick Gallo, Jr
Respondent:
Chad Kolitwenzew
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James York v. City of Lewisburg, TN, et al
as 22-5130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES GREGORY YORK
Defendant:
CITY OF LEWISBURG, TN
Defendant / Appellant:
KYLAR GENTRY, Patrolman
Armistead v. Hooks
as 5:2021hc02204
Petitioner:
James Gregory Armistead
Respondent:
Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUCKWORTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23611
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY DUCKWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: James Sears
as 21-11730
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GREGORY SEARS
Mary Outlaw, et al v. Plantation Pipe Line Company, et al
as 21-11787
Defendant / Appellee:
PLANTATION PIPE LINE COMPANY and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS LP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY JOSEPHINE OUTLAW and JAMES GREGORY OUTLAW
Armistead v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03109
Defendant:
Ms. Paige, Mr. Gary, Erik A. Hooks and others
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Armistead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14722
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY CORY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
