Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Grimes v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as ILS/3:24-pq-01345
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James Grimes
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Grimes v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01345
Plaintiff:
James Grimes
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Syngenta AG
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimes v. Watts, et al
as 23-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
KATRINA WATTS, SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE, JOE MCSHERRY and others
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00718
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Wats et al
as 1:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Grimes
Defendant:
Katrina Wats, Shell Point Mortgage, Joe McSherry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grimes v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
James Grimes
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
GRIMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01089
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRIMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2022cv00020
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Warden John Lopze and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Bowers
as 7:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Warden Rodger Bowers and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Bowers
as 4:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Warden Rodger Bowers and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
